RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 214

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 214  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P8H61-I LX R2.0/RM/SI
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130222
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 01:32
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 88.6
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 186
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 437
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74% Very good
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 93.8
Parallax 84.6
76% 90.8 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 87.1
Splatting 74.5
69% 85.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 120GB SSD 120GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.25.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 189 208 222 224 220 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.7% Average
Read 208
Write 193
Mixed 166
SusWrite 196
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 42.9
4K Mixed 14.1
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 18.6
24% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 94%
Lexar 480GB SSD 480GB
342GB free
Firmware: V3.0.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 195 203 203 191 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 193
Write 188
Mixed 184
SusWrite 184
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 20.5
77% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 22
20% 30.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 110%
WD My Book 1230 2TB
561GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 54.4
Write 22
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 25.2
37% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
48% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 017A 78.B1GEP.9LZ0C 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 214 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 214

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback