HP ProBook 450 G7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G7  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86A0
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 67
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 127
50% 83.9 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 234
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 86A0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 5.7
4% 7.43 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-000H1 512GB
280GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 130 151 141 153 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 779
Write 171
Mixed 260
SusWrite 151
74% 340 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 8.9
39% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 450 G7 Builds (Compare 1,755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback