Asrock B450M/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M/ac  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 00:36
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 658
66% 539 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 120
Parallax 126
109% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.7
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpekkf512g8 NVMe INTEL 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D06N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 526 523 528 537 533 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,265
Write 1,169
Mixed 1,143
SusWrite 567
284% 1,286 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 66.4
214% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 495
DQ Mixed 688
510% 684 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 222%
Great: 269%
Ssdsc2kb960g8l 01PE326D7A09674LEN 960GB
313GB free
Firmware: XCV1LX38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 414 416 427 427 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 326
Write 398
Mixed 337
SusWrite 417
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 29.5
104% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 262
208% 289 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 91%
St6000nm0115 00FN174 00FN177LEN 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: LB88
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 196 198 198 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 182
Write 190
Mixed 101
SusWrite 197
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1.1
8% 3.67 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.7
2% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 25%
Toshiba THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: 57DA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 932 955 901 971 979 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,105
Write 880
Mixed 770
SusWrite 930
207% 921 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 44
149% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 843
DQ Write 613
DQ Mixed 608
487% 688 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 180%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 7EH67AA# Kingston HP26D4U9S8MD-8 7EH67AA# 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 28.2
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 27.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M/ac Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback