ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 17 Laptop PC-cp0056nr

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	HP 17 Laptop PC-cp0056nr (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8844
Memory	4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211124
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '23 at 19:50
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Graphics 10,258 User benchmarks, average bench 38% FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 38.4 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 87.5 28% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 98 16% 112 Pts	64-Core 90.5 6% 90.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 8844) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.10.30.01 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 2.9 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40znv256g KIOXIA 256GB 13,541 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP00AE00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 407 581 375 346 340 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 300 Write 344 Mixed 378 SusWrite 413 81% 359 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 8 28% 9.93 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 136 116% 171 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 210%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2667, 3200 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 11.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 210 19% 210 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback