TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 14:46
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 219
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 725
72% 586 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 87.2%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.5% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 127
Parallax 118
97% 121 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 125
Splatting 109
93% 113 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 95.5%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1277 1283 1012 927 880 848 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,467
Mixed 842
SusWrite 1,038
299% 1,342 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 48
157% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 550
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 495
359% 469 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑
This bench: 214%
 Great: 353%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB
240GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 795 806 572 563 563 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 1,048
Write 827
Mixed 695
SusWrite 677
182% 812 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 46.7
151% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 461
342% 452 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑
This bench: 150%
 Great: 313%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
891GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 155 167 116 66 3.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
44% Average
Read 438
Write 301
Mixed 260
SusWrite 99.2
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 10.3
55% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 73
DQ Mixed 28.8
39% 73.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 44%
 Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU64GX4M4D3000C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.9
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 39.2
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 22.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 167%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel  $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples273x
Core i7-5820KIntel  $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples92x
Core i7-6850KIntel  $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples64x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples101x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples40x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples15x
RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback