Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 75%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 657
72% 568 Pts
64-Core 679
42% 679 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 195
Parallax 121
98% 146 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 128
Splatting 114
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 308 307 300 303 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 433
Write 237
Mixed 234
SusWrite 303
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 28.6
114% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 206
181% 275 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 126%
WD Elements 500GB
466GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 117
136% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 1TB
313GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 93.6
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 95
112% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 23.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 57%
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 49%

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $551
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback