Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 days ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 13:00
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$123
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 236
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 570
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$323
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 192
Parallax 116
96% 142 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 120
Splatting 108
90% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 291 278 264 257 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 472
Write 293
Mixed 249
SusWrite 269
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 25
117% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 239
198% 283 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 126%
WD Elements 500GB
466GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 110
Write 118
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 117
138% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 1TB
313GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 96 94 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 95.1
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 95.3
114% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2400C16K4 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 16.2
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 144 24.5" 1280 720 LEN2450 Y25f
Typical Z370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M-ITX/ac - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $663
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $315Nvidia RTX 3060 $330Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $194Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $140Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback