Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 73.8 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 140 56% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 498 45% 378 Pts	64-Core 1,219 75% 1,219 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 8 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 9.7 6% 11.2 fps	MRender 15.6 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 10.3 9% 11 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 487GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 72 82 149 111 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 303 Write 185 Mixed 175 SusWrite 107 43% 192 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 12.1 49% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 92.9 DQ Mixed 61.7 65% 110 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 255%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron-002C 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9N1 Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9N1 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9N1 Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9N1 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9N1... 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 49.5 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 31.3 107% 37.3 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	94x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	76x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	75x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	34x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16