PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 DELUXE (all builds) |
Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110311 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 05:49 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 19 48 61 60 63 MB/s
|
38.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD 10EADS External 1TB
94GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 28 28 28 MB/s
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
236GB free, PID 0611
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 73 73 74 73 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 587x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 162x |
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 106x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 76x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 60x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $713 |