MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 23:40
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 681
71% 570 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12F4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 40
Parallax 7.4
5% 17.9 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 8.4
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AI1 256GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1123 278 226 307 311 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 1,190
Mixed 1145
SusWrite 388
227% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 66.4
229% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 699
DQ Mixed 792
596% 801 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 184%
Great: 211%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
64GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 65 58 56 56 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 473
Write 346
Mixed 314
SusWrite 84.8
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 35.6
128% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 106
124% 216 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 04CB 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 23.9
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 24.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback