Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER F15KR 001
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 186
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 315
45% 329 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 233C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 7.7
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
2% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
853GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 53 52 85 102 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 131
Write 116
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 76.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 0.7
259% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FHP Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
61.5% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 18.6
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 14.7
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL) Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback