Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 15:44
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 87
48% 71.5 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 143
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 146
9% 146 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.8
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asrock RAM Disk 4GB
4GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,749
Write 1875
Mixed 1,914
414% 1,846 MB/s
4K Read 206
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 182
640% 189 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 460
DQ Mixed 502
379% 511 MB/s
CHN 25SA TA01M 120 120GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 159 150 168 162 153 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
490GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 137 134 137 139 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 131
Write 95
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 136
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$60
186GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 55 53 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 42
Mixed 34
SusWrite 54.1
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL KHX1600C9D3/4GX F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.4
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback