HP Compaq 15 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP Compaq 15 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2212
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 14:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 37.6
2-Core 59.8
34% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 82.7
8-Core 92.6
12% 87.6 Pts
64-Core 88.5
6% 88.5 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.68% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 4.4
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.68%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V TRUST 256GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 85 73 8.1 121 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 371
Write 301
Mixed 315
SusWrite 71.1
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 15.6
64% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 42.3
57% 101 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 15 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 15 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback