Biostar TA890GXB HD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar TA890GXB HD  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 01:42
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 102
51% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 255
28% 222 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
PwrHis(1787 2304) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 14.2
13% 16 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.55%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 95 95 67 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 115
Write 90
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 87.3
22% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 17.7
71% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 28.5
29% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 83%
Patriot P210 512GB
429GB free
Firmware: SBFM6B.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 271 173 66 71 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 163
Write 94.1
Mixed 84.4
SusWrite 152
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 7.7
34% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 13.7
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
891GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 95 95 68 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 87.4
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500410AS 500GB
87GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 71 71 74 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 78.2
Write 85.1
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 82
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA890GXB HD Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA890GXB HD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback