Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 55%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 21:29
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 564
66% 515 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.5% Good
Lighting 91.8
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 77.5
75% 86.2 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 72
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 312 138 243 289 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,354
Write 1,719
Mixed 1,340
SusWrite 399
271% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 37.5
143% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 818
624% 854 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 161%
Great: 365%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
489GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 403 383 247 246 247 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 390
Write 440
Mixed 329
SusWrite 321
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 26.7
91% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 322
242% 324 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 04CB DDR4 3200 04CB DDR4 3200 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 27.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 36.8
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 62%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 52%

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback