Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
46% Average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 154
56% 100 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 229
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.1% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 8.3
Parallax 7.6
4% 7.1 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.5
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.1%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 384 194 117 122 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 433
Write 378
Mixed 284
SusWrite 153
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 0.3
31% 9.93 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 0.1
20% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3000C15D4/16GX 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,710 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback