Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 16:57
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$340
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 148
2-Core 293
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,111
100% 844 Pts
64-Core 2,123
131% 2,123 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3975) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (236 fps cap detected)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 236
Parallax 235
192% 236 fps
MRender 236
Gravity 235
Splatting 188
177% 220 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 170%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 41 38 28 9.2 0.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 496
Write 224
Mixed 353
SusWrite 56
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 50.3
170% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 156
129% 185 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 454 454 454 453 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 449
Mixed 454
SusWrite 454
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 54.7
179% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 198
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
447GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 454 454 454 454 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 406
SusWrite 454
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 56.1
185% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
706GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 110 111 110 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 155
Write 133
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 107
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 96%
SABRENT 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1188 424 425 431 426 425 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-4500 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 31.5
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 30.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback