Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5005U 50,603 User benchmarks, average bench 38% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 53.5 1-Core 21 2-Core 68.8 30% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 54.7 8-Core 50.8 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 23.9 2% 23.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 06B0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 5.6 3% 5.03 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
690 NEO SATA 128GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 139 42 119 119 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 296 Write 273 Mixed 236 SusWrite 126 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 5 54% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 14.3 42% 89.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HKED3082BAA2A0ZA1 1x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.6 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.63 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,120x
GeForce 920MNvidiaBench 5%, 11,731 samples	100x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	15x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	124x
KNWMX1-ETB 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 3,520 samples	65x
HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 6,821 samples	53x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28