HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 15-er1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion x360 Convertible 15-er1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A12
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220912
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 03:03
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 163
2-Core 309
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 815
83% 671 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8A12) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 21.6
18% 22.4 fps
MRender 21.2
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 18.2
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BH1 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1NFAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 880 773 1198 1177 1158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,099
Write 1,088
Mixed 908
SusWrite 992
230% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 53.2
163% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 520
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 466
325% 413 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 173%
Great: 263%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 36.6
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion x360 Convertible 15-er1xxx Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion x360 Convertible 15-er1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback