HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 22:57
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.5% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 175
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 461
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2204 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 72.8
Parallax 67.9
57% 70.2 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 67
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZ7LH1T9HMLT0D3 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HE58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 397 385 417 413 420 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 412
Write 420
Mixed 378
SusWrite 384
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 348
259% 342 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung LO8G1600CL11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback