Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 139 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.66% Terrible	Memory 1.71 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 35.3 12% 22.6 Pts	4-Core 43.3 8-Core 44.4 6% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 42.2 3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 4.66% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 312F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.12 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.6 Parallax 3.1 2% 2.97 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg30zmt128g TOSHIBA 128GB 5,624 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0106ADLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 165 358 490 389 434 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 496 Write 405 Mixed 420 SusWrite 362 95% 421 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 20.9 71% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 110 86% 118 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB 18,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.2 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.7 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 489 8% 489 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 30%, 139 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	3x

SSD
HFM128GDHTNG-8310B 128GBBench 106%, 1,447 samples	2x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmt128gBench 83%, 5,624 samples	1x

RAM
CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FB 1x16GBCrucialBench 45%, 202 samples	2x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16