Avita NS14A6

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Avita NS14A6 (all builds)
Motherboard	AVITA 6Q14DA9M83
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200807
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '21 at 10:46
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 139 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 29.3 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 24.4 18% 25.6 Pts	4-Core 52 8-Core 53.3 7% 52.7 Pts	64-Core 58.6 4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(1DC2 2208) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.30.28 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3 2% 2.83 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 3.7 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 176 198 248 198 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 298 Write 270 Mixed 322 SusWrite 206 62% 274 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 17.1 4K Mixed 9.2 29% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 114 91% 128 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 151%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GB 213 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 3 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.7% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 6.8 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 259 15% 259 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	14"	1280 720	BOE0868

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NS14A6 Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Avita NS14A6

CPU
Ryzen 5 3500UAMDBench 48%, 78,189 samples	37x
Ryzen 3 3200UAMDBench 41%, 21,522 samples	15x
A9-9420e RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 30%, 139 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	37x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	16x
Radeon Vega 3 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 27,821 samples	15x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	41x
S50AF512GB 512GBForeseeBench 87%, 409 samples	26x
SSD 256GBHoodiskBench 75%, 135 samples	7x

RAM
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 61%, 15,613 samples	37x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 9,575 samples	19x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 42%, 213 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16