PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Lenovo 4524BL8 (all builds) |
Motherboard | LENOVO |
Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120718 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 15 '23 at 11:18 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 67% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 45 48 49 47 45 MB/s
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 21x |
Core i3-2120Intel $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 4x |
Core i7-2600Intel $166Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $337 |