Lenovo 20FXS07700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20FXS07700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS07700
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 10:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 112
34% 218 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5050) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 7.4
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HAJQ-000H7 512GB
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 369 408 389 412 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 402
Mixed 359
SusWrite 390
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 35.7
115% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 326
246% 330 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 20.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FXS07700 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FXS07700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback