MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 08:14
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 75.8
1-Core 161
2-Core 325
99% 187 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 926
84% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,031
64% 1,031 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.8% Very good
Lighting 89.9
Reflection 89.4
Parallax 91.7
73% 90.3 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 72.3
69% 86.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
576GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 140 139 146 144 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 2,451
Write 1,815
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 142
341% 1,535 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 55.8
183% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 202
215% 377 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 184%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$109
215GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
178GB free
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 25 25 27 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
70GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 376 377 377 378 359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 378
Mixed 420
SusWrite 383
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 38.4
128% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 147
128% 198 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
626GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 102 100 105 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 124
Write 147
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 99.5
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 106%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
813GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 105 105 108 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 144
Write 132
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 103
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
109% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2Z3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 34
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 31.5
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 31.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $813
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback