Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 71.8 1-Core 72.7 2-Core 142 56% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 407 41% 333 Pts	64-Core 493 30% 493 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q4 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.2% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 58 Parallax 81.8 42% 63.6 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 59.8 Splatting 43.9 43% 54.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 887GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 81 79 78 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 371 Write 189 Mixed 114 SusWrite 79.6 41% 188 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 18.4 70% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 91.8 DQ Mixed 107 87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C HMT31GR7AFR4C 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	41.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.1 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	64x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16