Gigabyte GA-EG45M-UD2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EG45M-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 10:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5450-$195
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 90.7
44% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 155
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.3
31% 38.2 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 27.2
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 86 63 79 68 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 223
Write 206
Mixed 190
SusWrite 77.1
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 28
93% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 29.7
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 19.7
24% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EG45M-UD2H Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EG45M-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback