HP 23-p110la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 23-p110la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B0D
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 17:59
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 56.3
2-Core 112
46% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 260
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2B0D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 87 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 94.1
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS541075A9E680 750GB
55GB free, PID 1065
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
Read 73.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 24.9
43% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-p110la Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 23-p110la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback