ACER A880GM-M9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemACER A880GM-M9  (all builds)
MotherboardECS Veriton Series
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 80.6
36% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 110
15% 111 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Elitegroup(1019 29BA) 128MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.85% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.85%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Consistent SSD 128GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R530E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 66 83 54 64 55 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.8% Below average
Read 186
Write 147
Mixed 136
SusWrite 66.7
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 18
67% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.5
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 26.5
23% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
488GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 84 64 78 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 78.6
Write 102
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 75.3
57% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.B1GDE.4210C 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A880GM-M9 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: ACER A880GM-M9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback