bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2183 x 1216 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221018
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 12 '23 at 08:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 200
69% 124 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 609
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 9.17.4.1
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.7% Average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 47.3
Parallax 91
37% 61.4 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 47.3
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 262 324 259 102 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 977
Write 904
Mixed 930
SusWrite 241
171% 763 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 38.3
128% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 179
130% 176 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 101%
Great: 177%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 47.6
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 121%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback