Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210525
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration74 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 63.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 228
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 478
54% 423 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 160C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 87.2
Parallax 55.6
54% 69.9 fps
Splatting 50.4
52% 50.4 fps
Poor: 37% Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1187
Write 1,094
Mixed 1,013
245% 1,098 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 52.8
188% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 583
411% 528 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 24GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.4% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 18.3
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 14.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback