Lenovo 43517Q1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 43517Q1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory7.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 15:35
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 156
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 253
33% 251 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
HP(103C 079C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 18.8
11% 17 fps
MRender 21.7
Gravity 18
Splatting 15.2
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 29 34 32 31 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 56.8
Write 65.2
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 33.1
39% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 52%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
9GB free
Firmware: 4.CCC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 45 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43% Average
Read 104
Write 14.2
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 45.3
36% 48.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43%
Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
20GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 111 109 103 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60% Good
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 106
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60%
Great: 69%
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
32GB free
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 64.8
Write 65.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 72.6
44% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- HMT151R7BFR4C Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- Micron 36JSZF1G72PZ- 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.1
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 43517Q1 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 43517Q1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback