HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 163
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 276
34% 259 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 323 286 73 7.5 186 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 450
Write 298
Mixed 269
SusWrite 194
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 12.7
95% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 15.7
57% 123 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KRE-D3S1600M/8G Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback