MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
14 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B86
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201221
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 14:32
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 706
69% 564 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$580
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 276
Parallax 308
238% 292 fps
MRender 348
Gravity 252
Splatting 189
207% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 202%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 919
Write 24.5
Mixed 208
81% 384 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 32.7
92% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 39.7
DQ Mixed 97.3
95% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 83%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
142GB free
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,501
Write 1,771
Mixed 1,334
344% 1,535 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 61.8
214% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 832
605% 795 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
180GB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.7
Write 107
Mixed 61.4
65% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 87%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
357GB free
Firmware: FP1R
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 92.2
Mixed 48.5
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
224GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 108
Mixed 77
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
31GB free
Firmware: CC91
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.6
Write 48.3
Mixed 35.2
33% 44.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
121GB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 63.9
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
LaCie BigDisk Extreme+ 2TB
881GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 50.1
Write 35.6
Mixed 27.1
45% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.2
107% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 23%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
28GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 85.9
126% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 72%
SDXC Card 495GB
61GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.1
Write 11.7
Mixed 14.7
19% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.8
257% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GD3000C16K4 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GD3000C16K4 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B86) - $83

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback