Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 3,267 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 152 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 552 52% 434 Pts	64-Core 821 51% 821 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 346GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS2705B SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 377 375 376 16 254 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 474 Write 388 Mixed 303 SusWrite 290 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 8.2 73% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 11.1 55% 123 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 211%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K40CB1-CRC 1x16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 10 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	752x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	379x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	147x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	130x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	187x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	180x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	160x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440