Ricoh Interactive Whiteboard

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRicoh Interactive Whiteboard  (all builds)
MotherboardiEi B442
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 09:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 166
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 377
34% 287 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.33 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS512GMTS400 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225H1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 165 210 209 221 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 224
Write 211
Mixed 203
SusWrite 202
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 31.4
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 150
120% 167 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown i-DIMM 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Interactive Whiteboard Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Ricoh Interactive Whiteboard

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback