Asrock B75 Pro3-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B75 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131224
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 08:57
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 89
2-Core 163
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 410
42% 342 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 69.7
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 92.3
57% 76.1 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 48.8
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
24GB free
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 410
Write 430
Mixed 356
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 33.7
129% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 187
173% 263 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
SSD 1TB PRO 1TB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2202T1MK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 226 221 256 258 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 354
Write 324
Mixed 298
SusWrite 233
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 38.2
124% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 202
156% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 120%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
35GB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 113
Mixed 74.7
73% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
71GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.6
Write 106
Mixed 65.5
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
WDC WD80 0UE-00HCT0 80GB
74GB free, PID 0701
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 20.5
35% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 15%
SanDisk Cruzer Snap 64GB
59GB free, PID 55a5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.9
Write 14.2
Mixed 7
18% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.2
236% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 19%
WD My Book 500GB
157GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.2
Write 34
Mixed 26.3
44% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.6
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75 Pro3-M - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback