HP Pavilion All-in-One

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82DC
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 23:47
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.1% Poor
Memory 7.46
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 138
36% 74 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 234
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 82DC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 6.2
0% 3.9 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 10.7
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 75 88 103 101 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 12.8
Write 58.6
Mixed 10.4
SusWrite 78.2
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6MFR8N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 3.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 428
9% 428 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback