| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '23 at 22:50 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.8%
Very good
|
80% 141 Pts
|
51% 394 Pts
|
32% 513 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
120%
Outstanding
|
133% 156 fps
|
110% 138 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 383 404 267 37 36 MB/s
|
78.9%
Very good
|
67% 301 MB/s
|
121% 42.6 MB/s
|
167% 250 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
311GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 160 160 164 161 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
81% 110 MB/s
|
206% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5702-094.A00G 1315 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
69.9%
Good
|
72% 25.1 GB/s
|
55% 19.1 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 855 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $89Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 200x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $62Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 110x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 91x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $99Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 61x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $176 |