MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 646
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.4% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 62.5
51% 64.9 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 62.6
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,790
Write 1031
Mixed 431
237% 1084 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 41.3
154% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 549
DQ Mixed 748
558% 753 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
233GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 134 134 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 122
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
60GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 180 181 142 182 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 174
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 109%
Jmicron Corp. 1TB
329GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 72 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 72.2
Write 63.3
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 70.2
49% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 23.3
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback