Asus GL553VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL553VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL553VD
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 12:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 170
56% 103 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 472
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 6.8
5% 14.3 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
201GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 238 206 203 199 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 422
Write 331
Mixed 312
SusWrite 218
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 30.2
99% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 320
249% 343 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 114%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 85 95 98 107 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 59.9
Write 17.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 101
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD2 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.7
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL553VD Builds (Compare 3,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL553VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback