Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '23 at 16:14
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$415
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 143
2-Core 262
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 957
92% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 93%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 83.5
Parallax 51.9
48% 64.9 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 48.7
40% 48.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1792 1893 2023 2075 2088 2013 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 2,163
Mixed 2,114
SusWrite 1,981
484% 2,147 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 68.9
219% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 629
DQ Mixed 727
543% 725 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 315%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 2TB
478GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2119 2167 1140 1135 1146 1144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,473
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,640
SusWrite 1,475
435% 1,942 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 65.8
213% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 786
579% 766 MB/s
Poor: 228%
This bench: 289%
Great: 379%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 58 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 61.8
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 58.8
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
281GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 58 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 46.9
Write 60.3
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 58.1
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 029E CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback