HP 870-003na

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	HP 870-003na (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	17.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '23 at 02:29
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 96 2-Core 191 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 312 40% 303 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Gigabyte(1458 3FE9) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 256 Parallax 205 143% 212 fps	MRender 204 Gravity 154 Splatting 130 129% 163 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S501 256GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0714C0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1179 Write 889 Mixed 819 214% 962 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 20.7 123% 47.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 500 DQ Mixed 352 290% 411 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 227%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175 24,007 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 269GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 261 269 135 118 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 403 Write 403 Mixed 289 SusWrite 201 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 24.6 86% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 285 DQ Mixed 178 167% 260 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 370GB free Firmware: AX0R2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 86 86 87 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	44% Average	Read 67.9 Write 83.6 Mixed 30 SusWrite 85.4 48% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 0420 0215 CMK16GX4M2Z3466C16 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	85.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 26 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.1 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-003na Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: HP 870-003na

CPU
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	10x
Core i7-6700Intel $219Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	4x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	3x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 71%, 2,125 samples	3x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 480GBKingston $175Bench 73%, 24,007 samples	2x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	8x
BLS16G4D30AESC.M16FE 1x16GBCrucialBench 48%, 785 samples	2x
CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 0420 0215 CMK16GX4M2Z3466C16 20GBUnknownBench 83%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $130

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16