Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory39.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 22:28
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,177
104% 882 Pts
64-Core 2,644
164% 2,644 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.14
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 381
Parallax 271
210% 303 fps
MRender 372
Gravity 268
Splatting 194
218% 278 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 190%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 591 345 658 410 566 461 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,771
Write 1,599
Mixed 286
SusWrite 505
230% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.1
205% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1046
DQ Write 756
DQ Mixed 509
486% 770 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 204%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$35
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1073 832 833 831 771 804 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1995
Write 2,137
Mixed 1695
SusWrite 857
375% 1,671 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63.3
221% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 948
720% 975 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 244%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 392 444 461 461 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 461
Mixed 310
SusWrite 428
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 33
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 126
121% 192 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
125GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 324
Write 49
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 49.1
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 15.3
72% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 23.1
32% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 85.2
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 37.3
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,032
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback