HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '23 at 10:26
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 124 56% 90.6 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 374 39% 312 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510 2,450 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.24 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 3.1 3% 4 fps	MRender 4.7 Gravity 3.6 Splatting 4.3 3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 261 312 356 390 333 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 444 Mixed 381 SusWrite 335 91% 403 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 40.8 135% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 329 249% 335 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 134%
Toshiba MK6459GSX 640GB-$40 254 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 521GB free Firmware: GK003A SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 82 84 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 73.5 Write 87.9 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 82.9 49% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 196GB free Firmware: JP1OA3GH SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 117 119 122 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 123 Write 122 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 118 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1600 C11 4x4GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.2 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 11.6 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,914 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	908x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	285x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	204x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	418x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	191x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	129x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16