Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 227%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 07:52
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 208
2-Core 413
122% 235 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,509
140% 1,165 Pts
64-Core 2832
175% 2832 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 223
Parallax 212
203% 228 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 163
Splatting 133
145% 185 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,119
Write 3,874
Mixed 2,661
790% 3,551 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 100
342% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,480
DQ Write 1,150
DQ Mixed 1,307
980% 1,312 MB/s
Poor: 215% Great: 537%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
180GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 485 487 484 424 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 468
Mixed 448
SusWrite 450
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 52.4
172% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 341
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 116%
Great: 130%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
89GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 173 174 172 176 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 404
Write 407
Mixed 368
SusWrite 177
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 75
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 116
90% 118 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 4TB
123GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 154 156 162 155 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.1% Very poor
Read 82
Write 91
Mixed 84
SusWrite 157
24% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 7.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 75%
CT4000P3SSD8 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2615 2613 2609 2583 2619 2620 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
397% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 2,539
Mixed 1,965
SusWrite 2,610
509% 2,243 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 244
4K Mixed 89.1
330% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,606
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,384
1,040% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 397%
Great: 426%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 95 95 95 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 88.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 94.7
112% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 42%
PNY U3 1TB
151GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 230 229 229 230 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 225
Mixed 223
SusWrite 229
311% 227 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 15.1
1,184% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 20.9
DQ Mixed 16.8
1,336% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 143%
Great: 212%
WD Elements 1TB
273GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 35.6
Mixed 25
SusWrite 34.9
44% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GD3000C16K4D 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 34.2
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 28.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z690 UD DDR4 Builds (Compare 5,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z690 UD DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback