Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 74.8 2-Core 150 61% 102 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 516 49% 407 Pts	64-Core 729 45% 729 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W5000 Graphics Adapter 33 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 0B06) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 22.3 14% 22.4 fps	MRender 22.6 Gravity 15 Splatting 20.3 16% 19.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 17%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 4,264 Write 1,984 Mixed 2,694 656% 2,981 MB/s	4K Read 210 4K Write 40.6 4K Mixed 53.5 408% 101 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 194 171% 267 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 20GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 271 Write 59.1 Mixed 77 132% 136 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 2.9 741% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 23.3 DQ Mixed 3.2 958% 14 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B2G70BH0-CK0 M393B5273DH0-CK0 36GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 16384, 16384, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75% Very good	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 27.1 83% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 75%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	75x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16