Lenovo 10VTS0CJ00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10VTS0CJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3141
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 Eight-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 683
62% 518 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 21.6
13% 21.7 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 20
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SA530 SDATB8Y256G1001 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40102101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 196 185 184 168 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 460
Write 471
Mixed 324
SusWrite 199
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 32.2
106% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 307
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 229
182% 256 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD Kingston KVR26N19S8/8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 29.7
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10VTS0CJ00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10VTS0CJ00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback