User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory15.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 153
60% 102 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 617
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899
Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
175% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 232
Parallax 261
203% 248 fps
MRender 293
Gravity 216
Splatting 159
175% 222 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 175%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 271 124 77 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 432
Write 438
Mixed 382
SusWrite 168
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 316
239% 322 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 134%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
190GB free
Firmware: B1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 240 242 253 255 258 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.9% Below average
Read 135
Write 97.3
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 263
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 9.8
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 14.6
11% 15.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 102%
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
23GB free
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 647
Write 800
Mixed 716
162% 721 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 30.1
98% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 300
223% 298 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
54GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 52 43 44 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 141
Write 138
Mixed 129
SusWrite 49
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 21.5
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback