Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 38.1
1-Core 30.1
2-Core 57.2
26% 41.8 Pts
4-Core 89.4
8-Core 164
15% 127 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725016GLA 160GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GMBO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 25.6
Write 57.1
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 52.2
31% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 40%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
63GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 45 45 45 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 44.4
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 44.3
30% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1638 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5.9
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 211
19% 211 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback